Squatchdetective.com
  • Home
  • | About
  • | Archives
  • | Squatch-D U.
    • Audio Page
    • Recommendations
  • | Squatchdetective.TV
  • | Hall of Shame
  • I Store
  • | Contact
    • Report Encounter
    • Media Contact Page
    • Booking Steve Kulls
    • General Comments / Questions
  • Vermont Chapter

Pointers on trailcam setup.


Snow tracks


Sasquatch Lineage


Thoughts on the
​ "UFO - Bigfoot Connection"

Picture

Welcome to Squatch-D University

The stark reality is the reason why mainstream science has not embraced the Bigfoot mystery, is because it is out of most scientist mores, to have something you cannot explain. So therefore every sighting has an explanation, via misidentification, misidentification, misidentification.

 In reality when a scientist skeptic who comes out and says, "It was a misidentification," without interviewing the witness, being on scene, is not being scientific at all and is not fostering a scientific explanation but rather an opinion of a simple man or woman, which has no greater bearing than your or mine. Remember that. Just because a PhD tells me I am wrong, when I know the previous, does not intimidate me, nor dissuade me from my pursuit.



The People Factor...

What has dissuaded myself, and others a lot of times in my pursuit has been the field itself, between the folks whom "talk to Bigfoot," every day or see the hairy guy "teleport," "cloak" or the folks that have got Bigfoot on the brain a little too much, where "everything that goes bump in the night," is Bigfoot, or the folks that level charges or offer opinions that were based on other peoples opinions which they state as facts, but are wrong facts. 
Fact is there are a number of scientific explanations for why people may experience what one would consider supernatural, but it has little to do with Bigfoot/Sasquatch being a supernatural being. 

I have learned however, finding my inner peace, to ignore this and let my actions and thoughts, speak for themselves. I have no malfeasance towards the other theories, because they are probably just trying to do their best, however I won't subscribe to such theories, because to me they're an excuse, for not getting the evidence, mainstream science is dictating they need.

 Too often there are too many researchers to look at a tree twist and rock stack, or a dark spot on a photo and say, way too quick...it's Bigfoot! That's wrong!

The way this mystery will be solved is by providing solid evidence using solid evidence collection techniques and giving it to science to be quantified and qualified. 

As a non-scientist researcher our job should not be to prove the mystery, but to provide evidence to science so they can prove it. 



Why Squatchdetective University?

Giving you the tools and education to step up your Crypto Research while educating the general public to the seriousness of the research involved.    

Here's some suggestions for conducting  a good Crypto Investigation


  •  Do not cave into solving this mystery with another.    
  •  If the evidence is "iffy", it's not evidence, nor circumstantial evidence.
  •  When conducting investigations, trust... but verify.  
  • Keep educated about the topic, and know your facts before putting them in the public.
  • Always, always, always...be serious, but know when to have some fun too.
  • Read the 5 Tenets of Bigfoot Research, by Steve Kulls

Departments

The 5 Tenets
History
The Classics
Origins
Investigation
Track Casting
Animal Audio
Media
Picture

Resources

  • Fotoforensics.com
  • Suncalc.org
  • Crime Scene Investigator Net
  • US Forest Service
  • US Park Service
  • US EPA
  • US Dept. of the Interior
  • US Geological Survey
Picture
Copyright 2006 - 2021
 Steve Kulls / Squatchdetective.com
Readers are free to use materials from this site provided that: 

the information is credited and the original intent, meaning or purpose is not altered.

This website is protected under :
The United States Copyright Act of Fair Use..

Section 107 U.S. Copyright Law: Limitations on exclusive rights:
​ Fair Use 
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phone records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.